Imagine being told that the evidence is now overwhelming that eating more food contributes to longer life.
If you are suffering from malnutrition this is of course true. If, on the other hand, you live in comfort and don’t bother to take any exercise, it is probably not true.
And if your diet is unbalanced with too much sugar and salt and carbohydrates, it is manifestly untrue.
The problem lies in the generalised nature of the claim. What is meant by ‘more’? How do we define ‘longer life’? And how do we define ‘food’?
No right-thinking person would waste five minutes on such a claim.
Read the rest here.
Public procurement is too often solely made on price, and not enough on true value and to account for areas...
In January 2020, Tomorrow's Company co-hosted a major Financial Inclusion Summit, to launch our report into the role of employers...
Mental health in the workplace has gone from a fringe idea to being mainstream and top of the agenda in…
Dear Readers, Here are a few articles published in the last few days that address issues – such as mental…
We need a social contract that is fair, so that everyone has the chance to progress.
Joining Russell Goldsmith at the London offices of GSK to discuss this issue, were Kerry O'Callaghan, VP for Global Brand...
Tomorrow’s Company is proud to announce a partnership with the c suite podcast, a monthly show covering topics such as Marketing…
Press return to search